UKSC/2026/0130 • Suresh and others (Appellants) v General Medical Council (Respondent) Permission to Appeal application lodged Case summary: Last updated: 1 September 2026 Last updated: 1 September 2026 UKSC/2026/0129 • Barnes and another (Appellants) v Nicholas and others (Respondents) Appeal issued Case summary: Last updated: 1 September 2026 Last updated: 1 September 2026 UKSC/2024/0081 • ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING Wathen-Fayed (Appellant) v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government (Respondents) Judgment given [2025] UKSC 32 Case summary: Did the Court of Appeal err in upholding the interpretation of the definition of “crematorium” in section 2 of the Cremation Act 1902 for the purpose of the radius clause prohibition in section 5? Last updated: 31 August 2026 ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING Did the Court of Appeal err in upholding the interpretation of the definition of “crematorium” in section 2 of the Cremation Act 1902 for the purpose of the radius clause prohibition in section 5? Last updated: 31 August 2026 UKSC/2024/0095 • PUBLIC LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS In the matter of an application by JR87 and another for Judicial Review (Appellant) Judgment given [2025] UKSC 40 Case summary: Do religious education and collective worship provided in a school in Northern Ireland breach the rights of a child, and the child’s parents, under Article 2 of the First Protocol (“A2P1”) to the European Convention on Human Rights (“ECHR”) read with Article 9 ECHR? Last updated: 31 August 2026 PUBLIC LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS Do religious education and collective worship provided in a school in Northern Ireland breach the rights of a child, and the child’s parents, under Article 2 of the First Protocol (“A2P1”) to the European Convention on Human Rights (“ECHR”) read with Article 9 ECHR? Last updated: 31 August 2026 UKSC/2024/0086 • TAX Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs (Respondent) v Hotel La Tour Ltd (Appellant) Judgment given [2025] UKSC 46 Case summary: Can Hotel La Tour Ltd recover the VAT on professional fees it incurred to assist with the sale of shares in its managed subsidiary, Hotel La Tour Birmingham Ltd? Last updated: 31 August 2026 Can Hotel La Tour Ltd recover the VAT on professional fees it incurred to assist with the sale of shares in its managed subsidiary, Hotel La Tour Birmingham Ltd? Last updated: 31 August 2026 UKSC/2024/0116 • TORT X (Appellant) v The Lord Advocate (Respondent) Judgment given [2025] UKSC 44 Case summary: Does the Appellant’s case against the Respondent under section 2 of the Crown Proceedings Act 1947 satisfy the first stage of the test for vicarious liability? Last updated: 31 August 2026 Does the Appellant’s case against the Respondent under section 2 of the Crown Proceedings Act 1947 satisfy the first stage of the test for vicarious liability? Last updated: 31 August 2026 UKSC/2020/0129 • PUBLIC LAW/HUMAN RIGHTS R (on the application of Coughlan) (Appellant) v Minister for the Cabinet Office (Respondent) Judgment given [2022] UKSC 11 Case summary: Are the voter identification ("ID") pilot schemes that were implemented in the May 2019 local government elections unlawful? Last updated: 31 August 2026 PUBLIC LAW/HUMAN RIGHTS Are the voter identification ("ID") pilot schemes that were implemented in the May 2019 local government elections unlawful? Last updated: 31 August 2026 UKSC/2019/0215 • TAX Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (Appellant) v Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme Trustees Ltd (Respondent) Judgment given [2022] UKSC 10 Case summary: (1) Whether the UK tax treatment of "manufactured overseas dividends" constituted a restriction of the free movement of capital, contrary to Article 63 TFEU. (2) If so, whether this restriction was justified under EU law. (3) If there was a restriction that could not be justified, what is the appropriate remedy. Last updated: 31 August 2026 (1) Whether the UK tax treatment of "manufactured overseas dividends" constituted a restriction of the free movement of capital, contrary to Article 63 TFEU. (2) If so, whether this restriction was justified under EU law. (3) If there was a restriction that could not be justified, what is the appropriate remedy. Last updated: 31 August 2026

UKSC/2020/0122 • PRIVACY/INFORMATION Bloomberg LP (Appellant) v ZXC (Respondent) Judgment given [2022] UKSC 5 Case summary: Whether, and to what extent, a person who has not been charged with an offence can have a reasonable expectation of privacy in relation to information that relates to a criminal investigation into his activities. Last updated: 31 August 2026 PRIVACY/INFORMATION Whether, and to what extent, a person who has not been charged with an offence can have a reasonable expectation of privacy in relation to information that relates to a criminal investigation into his activities. Last updated: 31 August 2026 UKSC/2020/0114 • COMMERCIAL Competition and Markets Authority (Respondent) v Pfizer Inc and another (Appellants) Judgment given [2022] UKSC 14 Case summary: When considering what costs to award following an appeal before the Competition Appeal Tribunal from an infringement decision of the Competition and Markets Authority, is there a starting point and if so, what is it? In particular, was the Court of Appeal correct to decide that there is a starting point that no order for costs should be made against a regulator if it has been unsuccessful, except for a good reason, or is the starting point instead that an order for costs should be made against the regulator where it is unsuccessful? Last updated: 30 August 2026 When considering what costs to award following an appeal before the Competition Appeal Tribunal from an infringement decision of the Competition and Markets Authority, is there a starting point and if so, what is it? In particular, was the Court of Appeal correct to decide that there is a starting point that no order for costs should be made against a regulator if it has been unsuccessful, except for a good reason, or is the starting point instead that an order for costs should be made against the regulator where it is unsuccessful? Last updated: 30 August 2026 UKSC/2020/0113 • COMMERCIAL Competition and Markets Authority (Respondent) v Flynn Pharma Ltd and another (Appellants) Judgment given [2022] UKSC 14 Case summary: When considering what costs to award following an appeal before the Competition Appeal Tribunal from an infringement decision of the Competition and Markets Authority, is there a starting point and if so, what is it? In particular, was the Court of Appeal correct to decide that there is a starting point that no order for costs should be made against a regulator if it has been unsuccessful, except for a good reason, or is the starting point instead that an order for costs should be made against the regulator where it is unsuccessful? Last updated: 30 August 2026 When considering what costs to award following an appeal before the Competition Appeal Tribunal from an infringement decision of the Competition and Markets Authority, is there a starting point and if so, what is it? In particular, was the Court of Appeal correct to decide that there is a starting point that no order for costs should be made against a regulator if it has been unsuccessful, except for a good reason, or is the starting point instead that an order for costs should be made against the regulator where it is unsuccessful? Last updated: 30 August 2026 UKSC/2020/0185 • DEVOLUTION Craig (AP) (Appellant) v Her Majesty's Advocate (for the Government of the United States of America) and another (Respondents) (Scotland) Judgment given [2022] UKSC 6 Case summary: Does the failure to bring into force certain amendments to the Extradition Act 2003 in Scotland give rise to a breach of article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights? Last updated: 30 August 2026 Does the failure to bring into force certain amendments to the Extradition Act 2003 in Scotland give rise to a breach of article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights? Last updated: 30 August 2026 UKSC/2024/0083 • PUBLIC LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS In the matter of an application by the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland for Judicial Review (Appellant) Judgment given [2025] UKSC 47 Case summary: What is the correct test to be applied when a court judicially reviews a decision by a coroner to disclose gists of information over which Public Interest Immunity (“PII”) is asserted by a Minister on behalf of the Crown? Last updated: 30 August 2026 PUBLIC LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS What is the correct test to be applied when a court judicially reviews a decision by a coroner to disclose gists of information over which Public Interest Immunity (“PII”) is asserted by a Minister on behalf of the Crown? Last updated: 30 August 2026 UKSC/2024/0123 • TAX Atkins and others (Appellants) v Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs (Respondent) Judgment given [2026] UKSC 17 Case summary: (1) Does section 850 of the Income Tax (Trading and Other Income) Act 2005 (“ITTOIA”) apply to profits retained by a corporate member of a limited liability partnership and subsequently reallocated to individual members of that partnership pursuant to an incentivisation and deferral arrangement? (2) If the answer to (1) is no, are the profits allocated by a corporate member of a limited liability partnership to its individual members under an incentivisation and deferral arrangement chargeable income tax, either (A) as miscellaneous income under section 687 ITTOIA; or (B) as sales of occupation income under the Income Tax Act 2007 (“ITA”)? Linked cases UKSC/2024/0122 Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs (Appellant) v HFFX LLP (Respondent) Legal issue Last updated: 30 August 2026 (1) Does section 850 of the Income Tax (Trading and Other Income) Act 2005 (“ITTOIA”) apply to profits retained by a corporate member of a limited liability partnership and subsequently reallocated to individual members of that partnership pursuant to an incentivisation and deferral arrangement? (2) If the answer to (1) is no, are the profits allocated by a corporate member of a limited liability partnership to its individual members under an incentivisation and deferral arrangement chargeable income tax, either (A) as miscellaneous income under section 687 ITTOIA; or (B) as sales of occupation income under the Income Tax Act 2007 (“ITA”)? Last updated: 30 August 2026 UKSC/2024/0122 • TAX Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs (Appellant) v HFFX LLP (Respondent) Judgment given [2026] UKSC 17 Case summary: (1) Does section 850 of the Income Tax (Trading and Other Income) Act 2005 (“ITTOIA”) apply to profits retained by a corporate member of a limited liability partnership and subsequently reallocated to individual members of that partnership pursuant to an incentivisation and deferral arrangement? (2) If the answer to (1) is no, are the profits allocated by a corporate member of a limited liability partnership to its individual members under an incentivisation and deferral arrangement chargeable income tax, either (A) as miscellaneous income under section 687 ITTOIA; or (B) as sales of occupation income under the Income Tax Act 2007 (“ITA”)? Linked cases UKSC/2024/0123 Atkins and others (Appellants) v Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs (Respondent) Legal issue Last updated: 30 August 2026 (1) Does section 850 of the Income Tax (Trading and Other Income) Act 2005 (“ITTOIA”) apply to profits retained by a corporate member of a limited liability partnership and subsequently reallocated to individual members of that partnership pursuant to an incentivisation and deferral arrangement? (2) If the answer to (1) is no, are the profits allocated by a corporate member of a limited liability partnership to its individual members under an incentivisation and deferral arrangement chargeable income tax, either (A) as miscellaneous income under section 687 ITTOIA; or (B) as sales of occupation income under the Income Tax Act 2007 (“ITA”)? Last updated: 30 August 2026 Sign up for case email alerts Sign up to receive email alerts when a new case is added by the Court.