The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom
发布时间:2026-09-03 | 浏览:1
We are the final court of appeal in the UK for civil cases, and for criminal cases from England, Wales and Northern Ireland. The Supreme Court hears cases of the greatest public or constitutional importance affecting the whole population.
The Court is open today from 9.00AM to 4.30PM
Log in to Case Management Portal
Practice Directions
Future Judgments
Forthcoming Hearings
Permission to Appeal Decisions
Visit the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council website
The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council Hearing 6 October 2026 Ritchie Capital Management LLC and 6 others (Respondents) v Lancelot Investors Fund, Ltd (In Official Liquidation) (Appellant) (Cayman Islands) When a company enters liquidation, does time stop running for the purposes of the Cayman Islands Limitation Act (1996 Revision) in respect of all liabilities, including actions based in tort, or just for submitting ‘proofs’ of debt?
The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council
When a company enters liquidation, does time stop running for the purposes of the Cayman Islands Limitation Act (1996 Revision) in respect of all liabilities, including actions based in tort, or just for submitting ‘proofs’ of debt?
UK Supreme Court Hearing 4 November 2026 R (on the application of Ammori) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) Was the decision of the Secretary of State for the Home Department to proscribe Palestine Action under section 3 of the Terrorism Act 2000 lawful?
UK Supreme Court
4 November 2026
Was the decision of the Secretary of State for the Home Department to proscribe Palestine Action under section 3 of the Terrorism Act 2000 lawful?
The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council Hearing 11 November 2026 Gryffyn Benevides (a minor, by Jason Benevides, her father and next friend) (Appellant) v Minister for Education (Respondent) (Bermuda) Lord Hamblen, Lord Burrows, Lady Simler Whether the mandatory testing regime 1. breached the Appellant's constitutional right to not be searched without his consent; 2. were not based on lawful authority; 3. breached the principle of legality.
The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council
11 November 2026
Whether the mandatory testing regime 1. breached the Appellant's constitutional right to not be searched without his consent; 2. were not based on lawful authority; 3. breached the principle of legality.
UK Supreme Court Hearing 12 January 2027 Townsend (Appellant) v Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust (Respondent) Is there an obligation on an NHS commissioning body to apply to the Court of Protection to resolve disputes about medical treatment (including life-sustaining treatment) where the treatment sought on behalf of an incapacitated patient is not being offered by the patient’s treating clinicians because they have concluded that such treatment is clinically inappropriate? Was the Court of Appeal wrong not to order interim relief under section 48 Mental Capacity Act 2005? Linked cases UKSC/2026/0044 Townsend (Respondent) v Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust (Appellant) Legal Issue
UK Supreme Court
12 January 2027
Is there an obligation on an NHS commissioning body to apply to the Court of Protection to resolve disputes about medical treatment (including life-sustaining treatment) where the treatment sought on behalf of an incapacitated patient is not being offered by the patient’s treating clinicians because they have concluded that such treatment is clinically inappropriate? Was the Court of Appeal wrong not to order interim relief under section 48 Mental Capacity Act 2005?
UK Supreme Court Hearing 12 January 2027 Townsend (Respondent) v Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust (Appellant) Is there an obligation on an NHS commissioning body to apply to the Court of Protection to resolve disputes about medical treatment (including life-sustaining treatment) where the treatment sought on behalf of an incapacitated patient is not being offered by the patient’s treating clinicians because they have concluded that such treatment is clinically inappropriate? Linked cases UKSC/2026/0050 Townsend (Appellant) v Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust (Respondent) Legal Issue
UK Supreme Court
12 January 2027
Is there an obligation on an NHS commissioning body to apply to the Court of Protection to resolve disputes about medical treatment (including life-sustaining treatment) where the treatment sought on behalf of an incapacitated patient is not being offered by the patient’s treating clinicians because they have concluded that such treatment is clinically inappropriate?
Take a tour of the Court
We offer a range of tours to suit individuals and groups, including in-person and virtual tours.
Exhibitions and events
Find out what's on, including our permanent exhibition about the history and work of the Court.
The UK Supreme Court cafe is open to the public Monday to Friday between 9am and 4pm.
Latest judgments • 27 August 2026 Latest judgments Latest judgments
Latest judgments
Latest judgments
Latest judgments
Permission to Appeal • 24 August 2026 Permission to Appeal - July 2026 Permission to Appeal - July 2026
Permission to Appeal
Permission to Appeal - July 2026
Permission to Appeal - July 2026
Future judgments • 24 August 2026 Future Judgments Future judgments
Future judgments
Future Judgments
Future judgments
PDF Chitty at 200 Lord Leggatt PDF | 169.80 KB 20 July 2026
PDF | 169.80 KB
PDF Climate Change and Private Law Lord Sales PDF | 89.12 KB 16 July 2026
Climate Change and Private Law
PDF Mechanisms of Constitutional Review Lord Reed PDF | 328.08 KB 15 July 2026
Mechanisms of Constitutional Review
PDF | 328.08 KB
PDF Mechanisms of Constitutional Review in Recent Cases Lord Stephens PDF | 301.47 KB 15 July 2026
Mechanisms of Constitutional Review in Recent Cases
PDF | 301.47 KB
LATEST JUDGMENTS
27 August 2026 Avon Freeholds Limited (Respondent) v Cresta Court E RTM Company Limited (Appellant)
12 August 2026 Augustine (Appellant) v Data Cars Limited (Respondent)
27 July 2026 Tesla, Inc and another (Appellants) v InterDigital Patent Holdings, Inc and others (Respondents)
Valeriy Ernestovich Drelle (Respondent) v Servis-Terminal LLC (In Liquidation in the Russian Federation) (Appellant)
R v Sheikh and others (Respondents)